Posts

Showing posts from August, 2022

Why is Cross- examination essential for criminal cases?

Image
  Are you aware of the criminal defense attorney's most potent tool against prosecution in criminal cases? If not, you can discover some fascinating information below that lawyers utilize. One of these strategies is to cross-examine witnesses to strengthen or add value to a case file. It helps cases that require further investigation where facts are left unsaid or unestablished. Cross-examination is an art that every lawyer must possess or learn.  What is the cross-examination?  In a cross-examination, relevant questions are raised about the matters brought before the court. It is one of the best legal resources for obtaining the truth. Supporting the victimized party cross-examination helps witnesses establish their credibility. Matt Horeczko is one renowned name in the field of legal advisory and criminal defense lawyers. If you have any queries concerning your criminal case, they offer free consultations to clients.   What's the purpose of cross-examination?  Legal procee

Violation of Order in California: Protection From Domestic Violence

Image
What if the charges for violating Criminal protective order concerning Domestic violence are against you? Section 273.6 of The California Penal Code labels violation of protective order as a crime. It is charged on an individual when they knowingly and intentionally break the order issued by the court. ALL ABOUT PROTECTIVE ORDER Protective orders are generally issued to protect an individual from any physical harm or other ways of misconduct like stalking, threats and harassment. The restrained person is barred from establishing any contact with the protected. The term contact used here has wider connotations, including via social media, text messages, or phone calls. IN WHAT CASES ARE SUCH ORDERS ISSUED? There are very high chances that restraining order will be issued according to expert Matt Horeczko , in cases where there are valid threats to the victim. However, the magnitude of restricted conduct is always dependent on the circumstances around the case. WHAT IF I VIOLATE THESE PR

What Happens If You Operate A Gun In A Road Rage Incident?

Image
  Road crime is typically defined as a driver overreacting to a perceived act on the street by another driver and immediately expressing their anger in an overt terrifying manner. Put simply, road turmoil happenings usually apply circumstances where a car driver overreacts to a perceived provocation on a road or highway and instantly chooses to vent their anger and frustration violently. In most circumstances, it contains: scanning off the other driver, mismanaging their car horn aggressively, screaming verbal insults out the window, tailgating, creating threats, hand motions, and driving their automobile in a swerving careless manner. According to Matt Horeczko , road crime is an exaggerated overreaction to intimidate the other driver or to vent their anger and frustration. Sometimes, they will question the other driver to draw over and battle. Road rage happenings have grown and are an important concern on crowded streets and highways in California. Information indicates that multipl

Typical Defenses in California Criminal Cases

Image
  To convict someone charged with a crime in California, the prosecution has to establish their accountability beyond an appropriate doubt. All defendants have the lawful right to offer a defense, usually through their criminal defense lawyer. Experienced attorneys will typically aim to discover weaknesses in the prosecutor’s case to choose a method for the best possible result. According to Matt Horeczko , there are usually a few general techniques, but selecting the best one will always rely on the facts and possibilities of the case. Every criminal case is outstanding and will foremost need a thorough review of all the facts. Some of the most typical defenses are detailed below. Reasonable Doubt Any criminal accusation in a California court has to be established beyond a reasonable suspicion by the prosecutor, which is the most elevated standard of evidence in the rule. In other terms, the offered proof must exclude all appropriate alternative theories of liability and provide the